![]() *One application per one serial number on the application ticket Please check the enclosed application ticket for details before sending your application.Īpplication period: Decem(Tue) to 23:59(JST) onĭate of event: Janu(Sun) *3 chat sessions The winners chosen by random drawing will be invited to participate in the online chat with Amatsuka Uto. With your purchase of UTOPIA(PCCG-02081、SCCG-00087) by Amatsuka Uto to be released on December 15, 2021, you will receive an application ticket to participate in the online talk event. (On the other hand, zoologists recommend not overgeneralizing: reptiles, for example, seem to get no increase in QALYs from live prey, so that enrichment intervention is net-negative for them.EVENT Uto Amatsuka: UTOPIA Release Celebration can measurably increase the aggregate QALYs of their kept animals, even if you might see more individual animal deaths from e.g. Zoos/preserves that provide larger enclosures, prey for predators to hunt, mating opportunities, etc. When zoologists talk about providing animals with "environmental enrichment", the thing you can measure the impact of that in, is QALYs. ![]() one where you don't expect to have any direct measure of subject preferences/satisfaction) - especially for short-lived animal-model species where you can observe their entire lifespan and measure their activities and health the entire time, and compare both of those against equivalent wild-type animals. IMHO, QALYs would be an excellent measure of animal welfare in a behaviorist paradigm (i.e. QALYs are also used to talk about end-of-life pain-reduction interventions, where "living in debilitating pain for one month" can come out as less valuable to the patient than "living without pain for a few days, allowing them to say goodbye to their family" would be. addictive drugs, can have their impact quantified in terms of QALYs-you can measure short-term QoL gains, long-term QoL lost, and lifespan reduced, and come up with a number representing whether the drug's experience is "worth" its consequences. Things that "feel good but are bad for you", e.g. QALY = quality-adjusted life-years, a measure used in longevity research and medical ethics to talk about the calculus of things that might prolong life at the expense of quality-of-life, or things that might enhance quality-of-life at the expense of lifespan, for people trying to optimize for the product of the two rather than just one or the other. No troll, bots, spam, or harassment.ĭo you have a more specific scientific question? Try /r/AskScience Do you have a question on a science-fiction universe? Try /r/AskScienceFiction This subreddit is a subsidiary of AskScience and the same rules of civility apply. Arguments that run counter to well-established scientific concepts may be removed. We are happy to discuss controversial topics, but we expect users to maintain some level of scientific integrity. Sources, especially peer-reviewed, are always helpful and appreciated. Posts and comments that are unrelated to science, promoting pseudoscience or are unscientific in nature will be removed. Help users work through questions they're unsure how to phrase for /r/AskScienceĭiscuss broader questions pertaining to science or scientific fields We also:ĭiscuss reading material or other educational topicsĬontinue tangential discussions that start on /r/AskScience ![]() r/AskScienceDiscussion is the place to ask any question you have about being a scientist, what's new in a field, or what's going to happen in a field. ![]() Welcome to /r/AskScienceDiscussion, help the subreddit grow by subscribing!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |